Acquiring a Business in Nigeria: What Prospective Buyers Should Know Before They Sign

Acquiring a Business in Nigeria: What Prospective Buyers Should Know Before They Sign

Every acquisition begins with an attractive story. A thriving customer base, a recognisable brand, a strong balance sheet, a market position worth paying for. It can be genuinely persuasive, which is why it deserves a second look. What a seller presents is rarely the whole picture, and the gap between the story and the reality is where most acquisition regret is born.

Beneath the numbers, a business may be carrying unpaid taxes, unresolved lawsuits, undisclosed debts, property with questionable title, regulatory breaches, staff entitlements that were never settled, or intellectual property it uses freely but does not actually own. None of this usually appears in a pitch deck. It surfaces, if it surfaces at all, through due diligence.

Due diligence is simply the discipline of finding out what is actually being bought, legally, financially, commercially and from a regulatory standpoint, before the transaction closes. Done well, it comes down to one question worth sitting with: what exactly is this business, once the story is set aside?

In Nigeria, that question has grown more complex in recent years. Reforms to tax law, data protection, competition regulation and the capital markets mean that acquisition risk can now arise from several directions at once. The following considerations outline what a prospective buyer should examine.

  1. Determine the Transaction Structure

Before any investigation begins, the structure of the proposed transaction must be clear. Is the buyer acquiring the company itself, its shares and everything that comes with them, or is it acquiring specific assets from the business?

The distinction carries real weight. In a share acquisition, the company retains its existing obligations, and the buyer takes on its full legal history. In an asset acquisition, the buyer can be more selective about what it takes on and, depending on structure, may leave certain liabilities behind with the seller. This decision shapes the entire due diligence exercise and should be settled at the outset rather than worked out afterwards.

  • Confirm Ownership and Control

A seller’s assurance that it owns the business is not sufficient on its own. Ownership should be verified against records held by the Corporate Affairs Commission [CAC], including incorporation documents, shareholding structure, share transfer history, registered charges and persons with significant control. Under the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020, shares may only be transferred and registered in specific ways, and registration may be refused in defined circumstances. Where the documented position does not match what the buyer has been told, that discrepancy deserves further scrutiny.

  • Examine the Financial and Tax Position

A business can appear profitable while carrying substantial liabilities. Financial due diligence should extend beyond headline revenue figures to examine debts, guarantees, contingent liabilities and related party dealings.

Tax matters merit particular attention. With the Nigeria Tax Act 2025 and the Nigeria Tax Administration Act 2025 now shaping the federal tax framework, buyers should review registration status, filing history, outstanding assessments, pending audits or disputes, and any incentives the business currently relies on. A clean set of accounts offers little comfort if an undisclosed tax exposure exists beneath them, since that exposure passes to the buyer the moment control changes hands.

  • Look Beyond Active Litigation

Pending litigation is straightforward to identify. The more difficult risks are those that have not yet crystallised into formal proceedings: a breached contract no counterparty has pursued, a regulator raising quiet concerns, an employee grievance that has not reached a tribunal. A thorough review should map not only current proceedings but the liabilities that could reasonably emerge after completion.

  • Verify the Target’s Assets

A business may list land, equipment, receivables, licences and inventory among its value, but ownership must be confirmed rather than assumed. This involves checking title to property, identifying mortgages or registered charges (which CAMA governs), and establishing whether key equipment is owned outright or subject to financing arrangements. If the purchase price reflects an asset, the seller must be able to demonstrate that it can actually transfer it.

  • Distinguish Ownership from Use of Intellectual Property

For many modern businesses, real value resides in the brand, the software or proprietary technology rather than in physical assets. Using an asset, however, is not the same as owning it. Buyers should examine trademark and patent registrations, copyright ownership under the Copyright Act 2022, and, importantly, whether intellectual property created by employees or external developers was properly assigned to the company. It is not unusual for a business to have built considerable value around technology that, on closer inspection, partly belongs to someone else.

  • Account for Employment Obligations

Employees carry obligations of their own: unpaid salaries, unresolved disciplinary matters, restrictive covenants and pension contributions among others. The Pension Reform Act 2014 sets minimum contribution requirements, and shortfalls in this area can accumulate quietly into a genuine liability. A workforce with unresolved entitlements is a workforce the buyer is about to inherit.

  • Review Material Contracts Closely

Many businesses depend on a small number of critical relationships: a major customer, a key supplier, a lease, a financing facility. These contracts should be examined for how they treat change of control, assignment and termination. A customer or lender may hold the right to withdraw, or to renegotiate terms, the moment ownership changes. Discovering this after signing is considerably more costly than discovering it beforehand.

  • Consider the Regulatory and Competition Landscape

Different sectors carry different licensing requirements, and not every licence transfers automatically with a change in ownership. Separately, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission has stated, as recently as April 2026, that qualifying transactions must be notified for prior review and approval before implementation. Where a public company or capital markets element is involved, the Investments and Securities Act 2025 may also apply. These are not procedural afterthoughts; they can determine the entire transaction timetable.

  1. Treat Data Protection as a Deal Issue

Where the target holds customer or employee data, the buyer is inheriting responsibility for how that data has been managed. Under the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023, buyers should examine what categories of data are processed, the legal basis relied upon, the security measures in place and any history of breaches. A data protection weakness rarely stays contained; it can lead to regulatory action and reputational harm well after completion.

A Problem Discovered Is Not a Reason to Abandon the Deal

Finding an issue during due diligence does not automatically mean walking away; it means the buyer now has leverage. Price can be renegotiated, the seller can be required to resolve the problem before completion, specific indemnities or warranties can be sought, funds can be held in escrow, or the affected asset can be excluded from the transaction. The purpose of due diligence is to allow these decisions before the risk becomes the buyer’s problem.

The Central Point

The most useful question in any acquisition is not simply how much the business costs. It is what exactly is being acquired, what liabilities accompany it, and what protection is needed before completion. A properly conducted due diligence process, one that feeds directly into how the transaction documents are drafted, is what turns those questions into answers and a risky purchase into an informed one.

Engaging experienced legal advisers early in the process does not delay a transaction. It ensures that the agreement ultimately signed reflects the business actually being acquired.

Team Vernia

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS IT RELATED TO NIGERIA’S REAL ECONOMY SECTOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS IT RELATED TO NIGERIA’S REAL ECONOMY SECTOR

This second part of the video articles on intellectual property law highlights IP as it related to Nigeria’s Real Economy.

What is real economy sector?, Examples of real economy, Significance of IP in real sector:
Innovation Protection, Competitive Edge, Legal Security, Attracting Investment, Revenue Generation and Fostering Innovation Culture.

Watch video article below:

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS IT RELATED TO NIGERIA’S REAL ECONOMY SECTOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: AS IT RELATES TO NIGERIA’S REAL ECONOMIC SECTOR

This second part of the video articles on intellectual property law highlights IP as it related to Nigeria’s Real Economy.

What is real economy sector?, Examples of real economy, Significance of IP in real sector:
Innovation Protection, Competitive Edge, Legal Security, Attracting Investment, Revenue Generation and Fostering Innovation Culture.

Watch video article below:

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: THE LEAST YOU NEED TO KNOW

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: THE LEAST YOU NEED TO KNOW

This first part of video articles on intellectual property law explains in simple terms the following:

What is intellectual property?, Intellectual property rights, Importance of Intellectual Property
Types of Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Laws in Nigeria, Role of Lawyers in Securing Intellectual Property, Challenges in IP Protection
.

Watch video article below:

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO COPY !

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY: YOU HAVE NO RIGHT TO COPY !

The idea of Intellectual Property [hereinafter referred to as “I.P”] as a legal concept is to protect the person who has expended energy and resources into a work; to protect the expression and execution of an idea, so that he can exploit it and prevent others from doing so unlawfully. Copyright is unique, unlike other IP rights such as patents, trademarks etc., the owner of a work does not need to register it; he/she becomes conferred with copyright in respect of the subject matter immediately. Hence, it is quite important and cannot be taken for levity.

An author has the right to enjoy his work. The right to reap the fruits of his labour, to benefit from the publication, performance, and other forms of exploitation must not be infringed upon by anyone. Belgore J, in Oladipo Yemitan v. The Daily Times Nig. Limited [1980] F.C.H.R 186 @ 190 held that the right of a man to that which he had originally made must be protected. According to the learned Jurist, “it must be stated that the legal position is that copyright belongs to the author who is the one that actually expended the work, labour, knowledge and skill.” If a man has expended energy and resources in making up a thing, the exploitation is his entitlement. The Court’s view in Mazer v. Stein 347 U.S 201 [1954] was that sacrificial days are devoted to creative activities which deserve rewards commensurate with the activities rendered. Section 6, Copy Right Act confers upon the owner the right to control the exploitation of his work. 

Not all works are copyrightable. Alphabets, numbers, names, general phrases and idiomatic expressions, idea of a product, etc.  cannot enjoy protection. Section 1 itemizes the categories of work eligible for copyright protection. They are: literary works, musical works, artistic works, cinematograph films, sound recordings and broadcasts.

Infringement

To the meat of the matter at hand, from time to time, there are always cases of copyright breaches especially in the entertainment industry, the music sector to be precise. It is very common to see artistes accusing one another of “song theft”. However, it goes beyond that. People may be unaware, but certain uploads on social media, unauthorized use of images amongst other actions constitute infringements. Section 15 draws up a large list of activities that constitute such. Nigerians are slowly waking up to the loss from infringements, however those who have lost a lot of money know the gravity of injustice it brings.

Who Can Sue?

Now, not just anyone can file an action in court alleging an infringement. You have to have locus i.e. a relevant interest in the matter. Section 16(1) provides that the owner, assignee or an exclusive licensee of a work are the persons that can bring an action for copyright infringement. Section 39 also provides for a “Collecting Society” [which may be formed in respect of anyone or more rights of copyright owners for the benefit of such owners] Hence, not every Tom, Dick and Harry can wake up one morning to proceed to the halls of a courtroom agitating a breach, he/she must fall under any of these categories. Mtn Nig. Communications Limited v. Musical Copyright Society of Nigeria Limited/GTE [2017] Lpelr – 50121 [CA].

Furthermore, while people casually think it is a matter that can be easily settled out of court, they fail to realize that it also attracts penal consequences. Section 20 provides that a person found guilty of infringement is liable to pay a fine of N1000 for every copy of every infringed work or faces a prison sentence of 5 years. Copyright infringement is criminal in nature. Section 39 (4), (5) and (6) also establishes punishments for breach of rights owned by collective societies. So, there is no doubt, copyright infringement is a criminal offence. This was the stance of the Supreme Court in Musical Copyright Society of Nigeria Limited/Gte v. Compact Disc Technology Limited [2018] Lpelr – 46353 [SC]. The Court in Mtn Nig. Communications Limited v. Musical Copyright Society of Nigeria Limited/GTE [Supra] explained that the general purpose of the Copyright Act is to make provisions for the definition of copyright, framework for its protection, transfer, what constitute infringement and the procedure to obtain remedy.

Enforcement

A victim of infringement has the right to seek redress. There are quite a handful of remedies available to anyone whose copyright has been breached. As gleaned from the preceding paragraphs, copyright infringement is criminal in nature and that automatically translates the availability of penal sanctions as a remedy. Apart from criminal liability, there are also civil ways to stop an infringement. They are:

Conversion rights

Section 18 states that:

“all infringing copies of the works copyright subsists, or of any substantial part thereof, and all plates, master tapes, machines, equipment or contrivances uses or, intended to be used for the production of such infringing copies shall be deemed to be the property of the owner, assignee or exclusive licensee or as the case may be, of the copyright……….”

What this provision is basically saying is, every material used in the infringement process, the owner/assignee/exclusive licensee can lay claim to it.

Section 19(1) provides that the breach of Sections 10 and 12 [which deal with first ownership of copyright and right to claim authorship respectively] is actionable i.e., the matter can be resolved by litigation. 19(2) further goes on to provide that anyone whose right has been breached is entitled to an award of damages, injunctions and any other remedies as the Court may deem fit to award in the circumstances.

2. Damages

This means monetary compensation. This could either be Special or General Damages.  In the latter case, the plaintiff [aggrieved person] does not need to prove that he has suffered any damage in particular. The mere fact that that there is an infringement suffices. While in the former, the plaintiff must prove that the acts of infringements have caused him certain harm.

3. Injunctions

This can be:

  • Interim Injunction

Here the defendant [person who is alleged to have committed the infringement] will be restrained by the Court from the continuation of the act complained against. This order lasts temporarily and it is granted in situations of emergencies.

  • Interlocutory Injunction

This is granted until the case itself has been fully determined. The essence, just like interim injunctions are usually to preserve the subject matter of infringement, so that there will be no further exploitation until the case in court is over.

  • Perpetual Injunction

This is also known as the permanent injunction. It is a final relief as it ensures that the infringer never interferes or infringes with the subject matter again.

4. Anton Pillar Order [Inspection and seizure order]

Section 25 provides that the Court can grant an order which allows the owner [accompanied by a Police Officer not below the rank of an Assistant Superintendent] to enter into the premises of the infringer to inspect the infringing items or works. The owner applies to the Court via a Motion Ex-parte [without notifying the infringer] and if the Court grants the application, it makes an order that enables the owner to go into the premises of the infringer, inspect and seize any material found there, which was used in the process of infringement.

The concept of Intellectual Property as stated above, is to allow a person who has worked hard to conceive and execute an idea, reap the benefits of his work. Therefore, anyone who is caught committing any act(s) that constitute infringement will face both criminal sanctions and civil liabilities. Hence, copyright simply means unless permission is given, you have no right to copy!

TEAM VERNIA
52B, Adeyemo Akapo Street,Omole Phase I Estate,
Off Agidingbi Road, Ikeja, Lagos.
+234 813 830 6975
[email protected]