Acquiring a Business in Nigeria: What Prospective Buyers Should Know Before They Sign

Acquiring a Business in Nigeria: What Prospective Buyers Should Know Before They Sign

Every acquisition begins with an attractive story. A thriving customer base, a recognisable brand, a strong balance sheet, a market position worth paying for. It can be genuinely persuasive, which is why it deserves a second look. What a seller presents is rarely the whole picture, and the gap between the story and the reality is where most acquisition regret is born.

Beneath the numbers, a business may be carrying unpaid taxes, unresolved lawsuits, undisclosed debts, property with questionable title, regulatory breaches, staff entitlements that were never settled, or intellectual property it uses freely but does not actually own. None of this usually appears in a pitch deck. It surfaces, if it surfaces at all, through due diligence.

Due diligence is simply the discipline of finding out what is actually being bought, legally, financially, commercially and from a regulatory standpoint, before the transaction closes. Done well, it comes down to one question worth sitting with: what exactly is this business, once the story is set aside?

In Nigeria, that question has grown more complex in recent years. Reforms to tax law, data protection, competition regulation and the capital markets mean that acquisition risk can now arise from several directions at once. The following considerations outline what a prospective buyer should examine.

  1. Determine the Transaction Structure

Before any investigation begins, the structure of the proposed transaction must be clear. Is the buyer acquiring the company itself, its shares and everything that comes with them, or is it acquiring specific assets from the business?

The distinction carries real weight. In a share acquisition, the company retains its existing obligations, and the buyer takes on its full legal history. In an asset acquisition, the buyer can be more selective about what it takes on and, depending on structure, may leave certain liabilities behind with the seller. This decision shapes the entire due diligence exercise and should be settled at the outset rather than worked out afterwards.

  • Confirm Ownership and Control

A seller’s assurance that it owns the business is not sufficient on its own. Ownership should be verified against records held by the Corporate Affairs Commission [CAC], including incorporation documents, shareholding structure, share transfer history, registered charges and persons with significant control. Under the Companies and Allied Matters Act 2020, shares may only be transferred and registered in specific ways, and registration may be refused in defined circumstances. Where the documented position does not match what the buyer has been told, that discrepancy deserves further scrutiny.

  • Examine the Financial and Tax Position

A business can appear profitable while carrying substantial liabilities. Financial due diligence should extend beyond headline revenue figures to examine debts, guarantees, contingent liabilities and related party dealings.

Tax matters merit particular attention. With the Nigeria Tax Act 2025 and the Nigeria Tax Administration Act 2025 now shaping the federal tax framework, buyers should review registration status, filing history, outstanding assessments, pending audits or disputes, and any incentives the business currently relies on. A clean set of accounts offers little comfort if an undisclosed tax exposure exists beneath them, since that exposure passes to the buyer the moment control changes hands.

  • Look Beyond Active Litigation

Pending litigation is straightforward to identify. The more difficult risks are those that have not yet crystallised into formal proceedings: a breached contract no counterparty has pursued, a regulator raising quiet concerns, an employee grievance that has not reached a tribunal. A thorough review should map not only current proceedings but the liabilities that could reasonably emerge after completion.

  • Verify the Target’s Assets

A business may list land, equipment, receivables, licences and inventory among its value, but ownership must be confirmed rather than assumed. This involves checking title to property, identifying mortgages or registered charges (which CAMA governs), and establishing whether key equipment is owned outright or subject to financing arrangements. If the purchase price reflects an asset, the seller must be able to demonstrate that it can actually transfer it.

  • Distinguish Ownership from Use of Intellectual Property

For many modern businesses, real value resides in the brand, the software or proprietary technology rather than in physical assets. Using an asset, however, is not the same as owning it. Buyers should examine trademark and patent registrations, copyright ownership under the Copyright Act 2022, and, importantly, whether intellectual property created by employees or external developers was properly assigned to the company. It is not unusual for a business to have built considerable value around technology that, on closer inspection, partly belongs to someone else.

  • Account for Employment Obligations

Employees carry obligations of their own: unpaid salaries, unresolved disciplinary matters, restrictive covenants and pension contributions among others. The Pension Reform Act 2014 sets minimum contribution requirements, and shortfalls in this area can accumulate quietly into a genuine liability. A workforce with unresolved entitlements is a workforce the buyer is about to inherit.

  • Review Material Contracts Closely

Many businesses depend on a small number of critical relationships: a major customer, a key supplier, a lease, a financing facility. These contracts should be examined for how they treat change of control, assignment and termination. A customer or lender may hold the right to withdraw, or to renegotiate terms, the moment ownership changes. Discovering this after signing is considerably more costly than discovering it beforehand.

  • Consider the Regulatory and Competition Landscape

Different sectors carry different licensing requirements, and not every licence transfers automatically with a change in ownership. Separately, the Federal Competition and Consumer Protection Commission has stated, as recently as April 2026, that qualifying transactions must be notified for prior review and approval before implementation. Where a public company or capital markets element is involved, the Investments and Securities Act 2025 may also apply. These are not procedural afterthoughts; they can determine the entire transaction timetable.

  1. Treat Data Protection as a Deal Issue

Where the target holds customer or employee data, the buyer is inheriting responsibility for how that data has been managed. Under the Nigeria Data Protection Act 2023, buyers should examine what categories of data are processed, the legal basis relied upon, the security measures in place and any history of breaches. A data protection weakness rarely stays contained; it can lead to regulatory action and reputational harm well after completion.

A Problem Discovered Is Not a Reason to Abandon the Deal

Finding an issue during due diligence does not automatically mean walking away; it means the buyer now has leverage. Price can be renegotiated, the seller can be required to resolve the problem before completion, specific indemnities or warranties can be sought, funds can be held in escrow, or the affected asset can be excluded from the transaction. The purpose of due diligence is to allow these decisions before the risk becomes the buyer’s problem.

The Central Point

The most useful question in any acquisition is not simply how much the business costs. It is what exactly is being acquired, what liabilities accompany it, and what protection is needed before completion. A properly conducted due diligence process, one that feeds directly into how the transaction documents are drafted, is what turns those questions into answers and a risky purchase into an informed one.

Engaging experienced legal advisers early in the process does not delay a transaction. It ensures that the agreement ultimately signed reflects the business actually being acquired.

Team Vernia

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS IT RELATED TO NIGERIA’S REAL ECONOMY SECTOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS IT RELATED TO NIGERIA’S REAL ECONOMY SECTOR

This second part of the video articles on intellectual property law highlights IP as it related to Nigeria’s Real Economy.

What is real economy sector?, Examples of real economy, Significance of IP in real sector:
Innovation Protection, Competitive Edge, Legal Security, Attracting Investment, Revenue Generation and Fostering Innovation Culture.

Watch video article below:

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY AS IT RELATED TO NIGERIA’S REAL ECONOMY SECTOR

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: AS IT RELATES TO NIGERIA’S REAL ECONOMIC SECTOR

This second part of the video articles on intellectual property law highlights IP as it related to Nigeria’s Real Economy.

What is real economy sector?, Examples of real economy, Significance of IP in real sector:
Innovation Protection, Competitive Edge, Legal Security, Attracting Investment, Revenue Generation and Fostering Innovation Culture.

Watch video article below:

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: THE LEAST YOU NEED TO KNOW

INTELLECTUAL PROPERTY LAW: THE LEAST YOU NEED TO KNOW

This first part of video articles on intellectual property law explains in simple terms the following:

What is intellectual property?, Intellectual property rights, Importance of Intellectual Property
Types of Intellectual Property, Intellectual Property Laws in Nigeria, Role of Lawyers in Securing Intellectual Property, Challenges in IP Protection
.

Watch video article below:

THE 2023 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: A CASE OF GRAMMAR VS. GAVEL

THE 2023 PRESIDENTIAL ELECTION: A CASE OF GRAMMAR VS. GAVEL

SECTION 134 (1) of the 1999 CONSTITUTION provides that in order to be declared the winner of an election, a candidate running for the office of the President of Nigeria must:

a. Have majority of the votes cast in the election; and
b. He has not less than one-quarter of the votes [25%] cast in each of at least two-third of all States of the Federation [24 States] and the Federal Capital Territory, Abuja.

The 2023 General Federal Elections conducted on the 25th of February 2023, resulted in Asiwaju Bola Ahmed Tinubu, the Presidential Candidate of the All Progressive Congress as the winner of the election. However, the results as released by the Independent Electoral Commission [INEC] shows that he was not able to win up to 25% of the votes cast in the F.C.T. This has led to a debate on whether or not, he should be declared the winner, going by the interpretation of Section 134 (b) of the Constitution. There are 2 schools of thought on this:

1. A candidate needs to score 25% of the total votes in 24 States including the F.C.T.
2. A candidate needs to score 25% of the total votes in 24 States and 25% in the F.C.T too.

Section 6 of the Constitution establishes the Judiciary as the machinery charged with the interpretation of laws. Hence the Supreme Court, being the Apex Court is burdened with this enormous responsibility. In the celebrated decision of Awolowo v. Shagari [1979] Sc 62/1979, the locus classicus which establishes the use of Literal Rule in interpretation of statutes, the Supreme Court held that laws should be given their literal interpretation, especially where there is no ambiguity of any kind.

“When interpreting statutory provisions, it is correct, as submitted by learned counsel for the appellant, that the words used must be given their natural and ordinary meaning except where, to do so would lead to absurdity.”

However, in this instance, the words of the Constitution, though look simple, are quite capable of two different interpretations. As we all know, simple punctuations can render several meanings to a sentence. In the same vein, a statute can be drafted in such a way that it is capable of having different meanings.  In such a situation, what should the Courts do? In the same Awolowo v. Shagari, the Court said:

It is also relevant, we think, to point out that anybody called upon to interpret any kind of statute should not, for any reason, attach to its statutory provision, a meaning which the words of the statute cannot reasonably bear. If the words used are capable of more than one meaning, then the person interpreting the statute can choose between these meanings, but beyond that he must not go…. “Judges are not called upon to apply their opinions of sound policy so as to modify the plain meaning of statutory words, but where, in construing general words the meaning of which is not entirely plain there are adequate reasons for doubting whether the legislature could have been intending so wide an interpretation as would disregard fundamental principles, then we may be justified in adopting a narrower construction.“

The Court was basically saying whenever a provision is capable of having two meanings, it would resort to picking one in so far as it is not going beyond both of them.

Furthermore, in a plethora of cases, the Courts have said that the intention of the draftsmen should be considered while interpreting laws, hence, a statutory provision is not given a wrong meaning. The Court of Appeal in P.D.P V. Edevbie [2022] Lpelr-58656 [CA], relying on Saraki V. F.R.N [2016] 3 Nwlr [Part 1500] Page 531, stated that the main object of statutory interpretation is to discover the intention of the lawmaker, which is to be deduced from the language used. But, the question is, how can we truly know and decipher their intentions especially in this particular situation?

The interpretation of Section 134 would have been so much easier if it used the word “including” rather than “and”. In this way, the meaning would be the candidate scoring 25% of the votes in 24 states including the FCT; thereby counting the FCT as the 37th State. But, it does not. Hence, this is subject to an alternative interpretation.

The buck stops at the desk of the Supreme Court. It can elect any of the possible meanings of Section 134 and it would be deemed right. This is because the plain interpretation of the Constitution can result to more than one meaning and in such scenario, the Court is enjoined to make a choice as long as it does not go beyond the possible meanings.

As said earlier, the Supreme Court has a heavy duty to discharge here. English Language is the latest hard nut the Court must crack. A battle of interpretation. Indeed, it is Grammar versus the Gavel.

TEAM VERNIA
52B, Adeyemo Akapo Street,Omole Phase I Estate,
Off Agidingbi Road, Ikeja, Lagos.
+234 813 830 6975
[email protected]